z-logo
Premium
New bioabsorbable septal repair implant for percutaneous closure of a patent foramen ovale: Short‐term results of a single‐centre experience
Author(s) -
Van den Branden B.J.L.,
Post M.C.,
Jaarsma W.,
ten Berg J.M.,
Suttorp M.J.
Publication year - 2009
Publication title -
catheterization and cardiovascular interventions
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.988
H-Index - 116
eISSN - 1522-726X
pISSN - 1522-1946
DOI - 10.1002/ccd.21998
Subject(s) - medicine , patent foramen ovale , shunting , percutaneous , surgery , shunt (medical) , thrombus , implant , atrial fibrillation , femoral vein , cardiology
Background: Permanent implants for closure of a patent foramen ovale (PFO) have a number of possible disadvantages including erosions, thrombus formation, and allergic reactions. The incidence of adverse events may be lower using a bioabsorbable device. Objective: To evaluate the short‐term safety and efficacy of a new bioabsorbable closure device. Methods: All 35 consecutive patients (21 female, mean age 47.9 ± 10.8 years), who underwent a percutaneous PFO closure between November 2007 and July 2008, were included. All complications were reported. The efficacy was based on the residual shunting the day after implant and at 1 month follow‐up and was graded as minimal, moderate, or severe, using contrast transthoracic echocardiography with the Valsalva manoeuvre. Results: The only in‐hospital complication was a surgical device retrieval from the femoral vein. Four patients developed a minimal inguinal haematoma. One day after closure, residual shunting was present in 56% of the patients (minimal 27%, moderate 23% and severe 6%). At 1 month follow‐up ( n = 33), one patient developed a transient neurological deficit and three patients suffered from paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. A residual shunt at 1 month was present in 45% of the patients (minimal 30%, moderate 12%, and severe 3%). Conclusions: Percutaneous PFO closure using the bioabsorbable closure device seems to be safe. However, a high rate of residual shunting is present at 1 month follow‐up. Long‐term follow‐up data are necessary to evaluate the efficacy and safety of this device. © 2009 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom