z-logo
Premium
Long‐term mortality after bolus‐only administration of abciximab, eptifibatide, or tirofiban during percutaneous coronary intervention
Author(s) -
Marmur Jonathan D.,
Poludasu Shyam,
Lazar Jason,
Cavusoglu Erdal
Publication year - 2009
Publication title -
catheterization and cardiovascular interventions
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.988
H-Index - 116
eISSN - 1522-726X
pISSN - 1522-1946
DOI - 10.1002/ccd.21773
Subject(s) - medicine , eptifibatide , tirofiban , abciximab , conventional pci , percutaneous coronary intervention , bolus (digestion) , hazard ratio , anesthesia , cardiology , myocardial infarction , confidence interval
Objective: To evaluate the long‐term mortality after bolus‐only administration of abciximab, eptifibatide, and tirofiban during percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Background: Studies on platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptor inhibitors (GPI) administered as bolus‐only during PCI suggest that this strategy may be similar in efficacy, safer, and more cost‐effective compared to a bolus plus infusion of GPI. Methods: We evaluated 864 patients (abciximab = 274, eptifibatide = 361, and tirofiban = 229) who underwent PCI with a bolus‐only regimen during January 2003 to August 2005. Results: After a median follow up of four (interquartile range, 3–4.5) years, there were a total of 95 (11%) deaths. The survival rate was 83% in the abciximab group, 91% in the eptifibatide group, and 93% in the tirofiban group ( P = 0.003 by log‐rank test). After adjustment for baseline clinical and procedural characteristics using a Cox proportional hazards model, the abciximab group had a significantly higher mortality compared to the eptifibatide group ( P = 0.003; Hazard ratio (HR) for eptifibatide compared to abciximab was 0.49 (95% confidence intervals [CI]: 0.30–0.78). The long‐term mortality was not significantly different in the tirofiban group compared to the abciximab group ( P = 0.33) or the eptifibatide group ( P = 0.20), perhaps because of shorter follow‐up period and fewer patients in the tirofiban group. Conclusion: When given as bolus‐only during PCI, eptifibatide may improve long‐term survival compared to abciximab. © 2009 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here