z-logo
Premium
Subintimal tracking and re‐entry technique with contrast guidanc: A safer approach
Author(s) -
Carlino Mauro,
Godino Cosmo,
Latib Azeem,
Moses Jeffrey W.,
Colombo Antonio
Publication year - 2008
Publication title -
catheterization and cardiovascular interventions
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.988
H-Index - 116
eISSN - 1522-726X
pISSN - 1522-1946
DOI - 10.1002/ccd.21699
Subject(s) - medicine , restenosis , stent , lesion , radiology , myocardial infarction , target lesion , surgery , blunt , cardiology , percutaneous coronary intervention
Objectives: To assess the procedural and clinical outcomes from a modified subintimal tracking and re‐entry (STAR) procedure performed using contrast guidance. Background: Previous data showed that recanalizing a chronic total occlusion (CTO) with the STAR technique was possible. However, this technique was considered difficult and therefore has only been adopted by a limited number of experienced operators. Methods: Patients ( n = 68) with a CTO of a native coronary artery treated by a single operator with this technique were included. Results: The right coronary artery was involved in 79.4%, the morphology was blunt in 77.9%, and CTO length was longer than 20 mm in 67.6%. Angiographic success rate was 80.9% with a 70.6% rate of complete recanalization. Stent implantation was performed in 82.3% of cases, with drug‐eluting stents (DES) implanted in the majority (92.7%). Procedural complications occurred in 10.3% of cases. There were no episodes of myocardial infarction during follow‐up, with 1 case (1.5%) of cardiac death. There were no cases of definite or probable stent thrombosis, and there was 1 (1.5%) possible stent thrombosis. The overall rate of in‐segment binary restenosis was 44.7%, and target lesion revascularization (TLR) was performed in 25% of lesions. The rate of TLR in lesions treated with DES was 29.4% and in those treated with bare‐metal stents was 50%. Conclusion: The contrast‐guided STAR technique appears to be feasible and relatively safe. However, this procedure is limited by a high rate of restenosis even with DES, and a second procedure may be necessary to obtain a definitive result. © 2008 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom