z-logo
Premium
Endovascular treatment of the subclavian artery: Stent implantation with or without predilatation
Author(s) -
Amor Max,
EidLidt Guering,
Chati Zukai,
Wilentz James R.
Publication year - 2004
Publication title -
catheterization and cardiovascular interventions
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.988
H-Index - 116
eISSN - 1522-726X
pISSN - 1522-1946
DOI - 10.1002/ccd.20173
Subject(s) - medicine , restenosis , subclavian artery , stent , surgery , embolization , endovascular treatment , radiology , occlusion , aneurysm
The endovascular treatment of subclavian artery (SA) lesions is less invasive than open surgical repair, with a low rate of complications. We report our experience in 89 subclavian obstructive lesions (n = 86) treated with stenting: 76 (85.3%) stenoses and 13 (14.6%) total occlusions. The left side was most frequently involved (83.1%), localized at the prevertebral segment in 91%. Technical success was obtained in 83 (93.3%) cases, 100% in stenotic lesions and 53.8% in total occlusions. There were nine global complications (10.1%): five (5.6%) at site of puncture, two distal embolization (2.2%), and two (2.3%) major events. The long‐term follow‐up was 3.51 ± 1.98 years, during which time 13 (16.8%) restenoses and 2 (2.6%) reocclusions were noted. Subgroup analysis of patients with stenting after predilatation versus direct stenting technique showed in‐hospital complications only in the first group, with a restenosis rate of 28.5% vs. 4.7%, respectively ( P = 0.003). We consider stenting for SA obstructive lesions the first therapeutic option. Cathet Cardiovasc Interv 2004;63:364–370. © 2004 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom