Premium
Intracoronary beta‐brachytherapy in chronic total occlusions: A subgroup analysis from the RENO registry
Author(s) -
Jain Deepak,
Geist Volker,
Lorenzen HansPeter,
Hartmann Franz,
Wegscheider Karl,
Bonan Raoul,
Urban Philip,
Richardt Gert
Publication year - 2003
Publication title -
catheterization and cardiovascular interventions
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.988
H-Index - 116
eISSN - 1522-726X
pISSN - 1522-1946
DOI - 10.1002/ccd.10432
Subject(s) - medicine , restenosis , myocardial infarction , stent , cardiology , population , surgery , environmental health
Conventional interventional therapy has been less rewarding in chronic total occlusion (CTO). Brachytherapy by its antiproliferative and positive remodeling effect may be more efficacious. Forty‐six centers registered 1,098 consecutive patients undergoing brachytherapy with the BetaCath system. Of these, 78 patients had 82 lesions (CTO) at presentation—the study population. With 67% in‐stent CTO, 8% graft CTO, 4% recurrent CTO, long lesions (27.6 ± 20.9 mm), and 31% diabetes, the cohort had high risk for recurrence. The in‐hospital event rate was 1.3%. Six‐month follow‐up revealed 1.3% death, 5.1% myocardial infarction, 21.8% target vessel revascularization, 77.8% improved angina, 34.5% binary restenosis, 12.7% reocclusion, and 10.3% late thrombosis. The results were comparable to all other patients in the registry, although late thrombosis rate was higher in the CTO group (10.3% vs. 5.0%; P = 0.047). In the in‐stent CTO subgroup (n = 52; 66.7%), there was no in‐hospital event, no follow‐up death or myocardial infarction, restenosis in 35.1%, and reocclusion in 10.8% of patients. In comparison, death or myocardial infarction was significantly higher in de novo CTO subgroup ( P = 0.005). Compared to all other in‐stent restenosis patients in the registry, the patients with in‐stent CTO had similar clinical and angiographic event rate. Thus, beta‐brachytherapy was safe, feasible, and effective in this broad population of high‐risk patients with CTO presenting in day‐to‐day practice. It was particularly effective in in‐stent CTO, where conventional interventional strategies are disappointing. Cathet Cardiovasc Intervent 2003;58:322–329. © 2003 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.