Premium
The effect of shock wave lithotripsy on nitric oxide and malondialdehyde levels in plasma and urine samples
Author(s) -
Aksoy Hülya,
Aksoy Yılmaz,
Turhan Hamdullah,
Keleş Sait,
Ziypak Tevfik,
Özbey Isa
Publication year - 2006
Publication title -
cell biochemistry and function
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.933
H-Index - 61
eISSN - 1099-0844
pISSN - 0263-6484
DOI - 10.1002/cbf.1349
Subject(s) - malondialdehyde , nitric oxide , urology , urinary system , medicine , urine , creatinine , lithotripsy , renal function , nitrite , chemistry , oxidative stress , surgery , organic chemistry , nitrate
Abstract Shock wave lithotripsy (SWL) is accepted as the first treatment choice for most urinary stones, but it has adverse effects on the kidneys. The mechanisms underlying shock wave‐induced renal injury have been discussed and include shear stress, thermal and cavitation effects and free radical formation. We investigated the effects of SWL on plasma and urinary nitrite, a stable metabolite of nitric oxide (NO), and malondialdehyde (MDA) concentrations. Between February and October 2004, 12 men and 8 women with renal calculi were treated using a Dornier MPL‐9000 lithotriptor. The ages ranged from 22 to 45 years (average age: 33.7 years). Plasma and urinary NO and MDA levels were analysed before, immediately after, 30 and 60 min and 24 h after SWL. Plasma NO levels were higher than baseline levels immediately, and at 30, 60 min and 24 h after treatment ( p = 0.016, p = 0.031, p = 0.033 and p = 0.045, respectively). Simultaneously, the mean urinary NO levels also showed significant elevation after SWL compared with baseline values, except for 24 h ( p = 0.021, p = 0.023 and p = 0.048, respectively). The mean levels of plasma MDA showed statistically significant elevation immediately, and 30 and 60 min after SWL termination compared with pre‐SWL values ( p = 0.012, p = 0.008 and p = 0.012, respectively). Urinary MDA levels obtained immediately ( p = 0.035), and 30 ( p = 0.006) and 60 ( p = 0.045) min after SWL were increased compared to pre‐SWL values. We speculate that SWL treatment causes oxidative stress caused by renal ischemia‐reperfusion (I/R) injury. Additionally, the increase of NO production may have prevented renal damage caused by vasoconstriction. Copyright © 2006 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.