z-logo
Premium
Reactivity Tuning by Ligand Effects: Gas‐Phase Reactions of Fe(C 6 H 6 )O + versus “Bare” FeO +
Author(s) -
Stöckigt Detlef,
Schwarz Helmut
Publication year - 1994
Publication title -
chemische berichte
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.667
H-Index - 136
eISSN - 1099-0682
pISSN - 0009-2940
DOI - 10.1002/cber.19941271222
Subject(s) - chemistry , reactivity (psychology) , ligand (biochemistry) , olefin fiber , reagent , medicinal chemistry , metal , oxygen , benzene , crystallography , ketone , substitution reaction , oxide , oxygen atom , stereochemistry , inorganic chemistry , catalysis , molecule , organic chemistry , medicine , biochemistry , receptor , alternative medicine , pathology
The presence of a benzene ligand in Fe(C 6 H 6 )O + (1) has a profound effect on the gas‐phase reactivity of FeO + . While the latter oxide is known to act as an efficient C‐H/C‐C bond‐activation reagent, the ligated species 1 is entirely unreactive in that respect. However, 1 serves as an excellent reagent for transferring oxygen to various olefins. In addition, it is demonstrated that the ligand substitution Fe‐(C 6 H 6 )O + + X → Fe(X)O + + 6 H 6 ) follows two principally different pathways. For X = C 6 D 6 and C 5 H 5 N the traditional direct substitution process with attack at the metal centre is operative. However, for X = olefins it is argued that the olefin will not initially attack the metal center; rather, the reaction commences by coordinating the olefin X to the oxygen atom of Fe 6 H 6 )O + . The resulting intermediate ( 6 H 6 )Fe(OX) + will then fall apart either to separated Fe(OX) + / 6 H 6 ) or to Fe( 6 H 6 ) + /OX, thus bringing about an epoxidation of the olefin rather than ketone formation.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom