z-logo
Premium
Metal‐Metal Bonding in Paramagnetic Chromium(III) Complexes – An MO‐Theoretical Case Study
Author(s) -
Janiak Christoph,
Silvestre Jérǒme,
Theopold Klaus H.
Publication year - 1993
Publication title -
chemische berichte
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.667
H-Index - 136
eISSN - 1099-0682
pISSN - 0009-2940
DOI - 10.1002/cber.19931260313
Subject(s) - chemistry , chromium , crystallography , metal , center (category theory) , magnetic moment , paramagnetism , stereochemistry , physics , organic chemistry , quantum mechanics , condensed matter physics
The electronic structures of the edge‐sharing bioctahedral chromium(III) dimers {C 5 H 5 Cr(CH 3 )(μ1‐Cl)} 2 ( 2 ) and {Me 5 C 5 Cr(CH 3 )(μ1‐CH 3 )} 2 ( 4* (Cp* derivative), 4 (Cp derivative)), the trinuclear complex {C 5 H 5 Cr(μ1‐Cl)} 3 (μ1‐CH) ( 3 ), and the face‐sharing bioctahedral chromium(III) compounds {Me 5 C 5 Cr} 2 (μ1‐CH 2 ) ( 6*, 6 ) [{Me 5 C 5 Cr} 2 (μ1‐CH 3 ) 3 ] + ( 7*, 7 ) have been studied MO‐theoretically by the extended Hückel method. Proceeding from 2 over 3 to 4* , or from 6* to 7* a 3‐center/4‐electron chloride or methylene bridge is replaced by a 3‐center/2‐electron methyl group (a methylidyne cap in the trimer). The 3c/2e bridges give rise to an increased metal – metal overlap population due to Cr – Cr bonding within the core levels. In the series of 2 – 3 – 4* this is accompanied by a decrease in the Cr – Cr distance (329 – 284 – 260 pm) and effective magnetic moment, μ eff (2.53 – 2.05 – 1.53 μ B per Cr at room temp.). The latter can be ascribed to an increased splitting within the chromium d‐block because of the shorter metal‐metal separation. The bioctahedra 6* and 7* feature even shorter Cr – Cr contacts than 4* (239 and 242 pm), primarily because of their face‐sharing geometry. However, their effective magnetic moments (per Cr) are 2.33 and 1.32 μ B at room temp. The high magnetic moment for 6* can be understood from the orbital interactions in the frontier orbital metal d block: A face‐sharing bioctahedron shows one σ, two δ, and no π type overlap, while an edge‐sharing bioctahedron ( 4 ) has σ, π, and δ interaction between the metals. In the former this destabilizes only σ* sufficiently to prevent occupation by electrons (leaving five orbitals for six electrons, possible spin multiplicities S0, 1, 2) while for the latter both σ* and π* are destabilized beyond electron occupation (leaving four MOs for six electrons, possible spin multiplicities S0, 1). 4* , 6* and 7* are unusual examples of metal – metal bonded complexes containing octahedral Cr III ions.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom