Premium
Design and Construction of Aroyl‐Hydrazone Derivatives: Synthesis, Crystal Structure, Molecular Docking and Their Biological Activities
Author(s) -
Kumari Pratibha,
Ansari Shagufi Naz,
Kumar Ravi,
Saini Anoop Kumar,
Mobin Shaikh M.
Publication year - 2019
Publication title -
chemistry and biodiversity
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.427
H-Index - 70
eISSN - 1612-1880
pISSN - 1612-1872
DOI - 10.1002/cbdv.201900315
Subject(s) - chemistry , docking (animal) , binding constant , stereochemistry , bovine serum albumin , dna , binding site , polymerase , biochemistry , medicine , nursing
Here, we report the synthesis and characterization of four new aroyl‐hydrazone derivatives L 1 – L 4 , and their structural as well as biological activities have been explored. In addition to docking with bovine serum albumin (BSA) and duplex DNA, the experimental results demonstrate the effective binding of L 1 – L 4 with BSA protein and calf thymus DNA (ct‐DNA) which is in agreement with the docking results. Further biological activities of L 1 – L 4 have been examined through molecular docking with different proteins which are involved in the propagation of viral or cancer diseases. L 1 shows best binding affinity with influenza A virus polymerase PB2 subunit (2VY7) with binding energy −11.42 kcal/mol and inhibition constant 4.23 n m , whereas L 2 strongly bind with the hepatitis C virus NS5B polymerase (2WCX) with binding energy −10.47 kcal/mol and inhibition constant 21.06 n m . Ligand L 3 binds strongly with TGF‐beta receptor 1 (3FAA) and L 4 with cancer‐related EphA2 protein kinases (1MQB) with binding energy −10.61 kcal/mol, −10.02 kcal/mol and inhibition constant 16.67 n m and 45.41 n m , respectively. The binding energies of L 1 – L 4 are comparable with binding energies of their proven inhibitors. L 1 , L 3 and L 4 can be considered as both 3FAA and 1MQB dual targeting anticancer agents, while L 1 and L 3 are both 2VY7 and 2WCX dual targeting antiviral agents. On the other side, L 2 and L 4 target only one virus related target (2WCX). Furthermore, the geometry optimizations of L 1 – L 4 were performed via density functional theory (DFT). Moreover, all four ligands ( L 1 – L 4 ) were characterized by NMR, FT‐IR, ESI‐MS, elemental analysis and their molecular structures were validated by single crystal X‐ray diffraction studies.