z-logo
Premium
Synthesis, Structure, DNA‐Binding Properties, and Cytotoxicity of Ruthenium(II) Polypyridyl Complexes
Author(s) -
Liu YunJun,
Zeng ChengHui,
Yao JunHua,
Wu FuHai,
He LiXin,
Huang HongLiang
Publication year - 2010
Publication title -
chemistry and biodiversity
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.427
H-Index - 70
eISSN - 1612-1880
pISSN - 1612-1872
DOI - 10.1002/cbdv.200900213
Subject(s) - chemistry , ruthenium , singlet oxygen , cytotoxicity , dna , phenanthroline , cleavage (geology) , bromide , stereochemistry , titration , medicinal chemistry , in vitro , oxygen , crystallography , inorganic chemistry , biochemistry , catalysis , organic chemistry , geotechnical engineering , fracture (geology) , engineering
Many ruthenium(II) complexes show high antitumor activities, and the in vitro antitumor activities are usually related to DNA binding. We designed and synthesized two Ru II polypyridyl complexes, [Ru(dmp) 2 (fpp)] 2+ (dmp=2,9‐dimethyl‐1,10‐phenanthroline; fpp=2‐[3,4‐(difluoromethylenedioxy)phenyl]imidazo[4,5‐ f ] [1,10]phenanthroline and [Ru(phen) 2 (fpp)] 2+ (phen=1,10‐phenanthroline). The DNA‐binding properties of these complexes have been investigated by spectroscopic titration, DNA melting experiments, viscosity measurements, and photoactivated cleavage. The mechanism studies of photocleavage revealed that singlet oxygen ( 1 O 2 ) and superoxide anion radical (O $\rm{{_{2}^{{^\cdot} -}}}$ ) may play an important role in the photocleavage. The cytotoxicity of complexes 1 and 2 have been evaluated by MTT (3‐(4,5‐dimethylthiazol‐2‐yl)‐2,5‐diphenyl‐2 H ‐tetrazolium bromide) method; complex 2 shows slightly higher anticancer potency than 1 does against all the cell lines screened.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom