z-logo
Premium
Intergroup helping during the coronavirus crisis: Effects of group identification, ingroup blame and third party outgroup blame
Author(s) -
Zagefka Hanna
Publication year - 2020
Publication title -
journal of community and applied social psychology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.042
H-Index - 63
eISSN - 1099-1298
pISSN - 1052-9284
DOI - 10.1002/casp.2487
Subject(s) - blame , outgroup , ingroups and outgroups , psychology , attribution , social psychology , in group favoritism , social identity theory , social group
Two studies tested predictors of helping across national boundaries. British participants reported blame attributions for the coronavirus crisis, either to the British government (ingroup blame), or to the Chinese government (third party outgroup blame), and it was tested whether this was associated with intentions to donate money to help outgroup members suffering from effects of the coronavirus crisis in the world's poorer countries. It was hypothesized that strength of identification with the national ingroup would be negatively associated with blame attributions to the ingroup, and that it would be positively associated with blame attributions to a third party outgroup. Blame attributions were predicted in turn to be related to outgroup helping, with ingroup blame being positively associated with helping intentions, and third party outgroup blame being negatively associated with helping intentions. Support for these predictions were found in one exploratory ( N = 100) and one confirmatory ( N = 250) study.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here