Premium
‘Lower’ social class of a client evokes class self‐awareness rather than discrimination in clinical reasoning: A video vignette study among British psychological and psychotherapeutic professionals working in the NHS
Author(s) -
Vlietstra Tom,
Woodger Nigel,
Northeast Tony,
McNamara Adam J.,
Morison Linda
Publication year - 2021
Publication title -
counselling and psychotherapy research
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.38
H-Index - 32
eISSN - 1746-1405
pISSN - 1473-3145
DOI - 10.1002/capr.12318
Subject(s) - vignette , psychology , class (philosophy) , social class , latent class model , working class , social psychology , clinical psychology , artificial intelligence , politics , computer science , political science , law , statistics , mathematics
Abstract Objective The aim of this study was to explore the impact social class biases may have on the diagnosis and treatment of clients by psychological and psychotherapeutic professionals working in the National Health Service (NHS) in Britain. Methods Psychological and psychotherapeutic professionals working in the NHS were randomised to one of two video vignettes representing a psychological assessment session with either a ‘lower’ or ‘upper’ class client. The accent and dress of the client were varied to elicit class stereotypes. The video and study measures were accessed online via a link to a webpage. Participants completed measures of clinical reasoning, namely diagnosis, risk assessment and treatment, as well as measures of class self‐awareness. Results Among the 156 practitioners who completed the measures there was little difference between the two groups for the clinical reasoning measures. The expectation was that participants believed a ‘lower class’ client was more likely to receive an ‘alcohol or substance misuse’ diagnosis ( p = .002; d = 0.40). Unexpectedly, seeing a ‘lower class’ client led to significantly increased class self‐awareness scores, particularly those measures indicating reflection on personal conflicts relating to practitioners’ own social class and the impact such biases may have on their work. Conclusions There was little difference in clinical reasoning between the two class conditions. This may be due to client class cues priming the psychologist to reflect on their own potential class biases. Practitioners may benefit from further reflection and training on biases related to substance use and social class.