Premium
Recording client sessions during psychotherapy training: From “an absurd idea” to “potent learning”
Author(s) -
McMahon Aisling,
Ledden Kathryn
Publication year - 2019
Publication title -
counselling and psychotherapy research
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.38
H-Index - 32
eISSN - 1746-1405
pISSN - 1473-3145
DOI - 10.1002/capr.12209
Subject(s) - irish , psychology , witness , thematic analysis , confidentiality , context (archaeology) , psychotherapist , ethical issues , medical education , applied psychology , medicine , qualitative research , engineering ethics , paleontology , social science , philosophy , linguistics , sociology , computer science , political science , law , biology , programming language , engineering
Background Audio‐ or video‐recording of client sessions is often used in psychotherapy training to develop practitioner skills and improve client services. However, opinion on the value and ethics of this practice is divided, with limited empirical research and no published research in an Irish context. This study aimed to add to the literature, asking two main questions: To what extent are client sessions recorded during psychotherapy training in the Republic of Ireland, and what are Irish psychotherapists’ experiences and attitudes regarding this practice? Methodology An online survey was distributed to members of the Irish Association of Humanistic and Integrative Psychotherapy (IAHIP) who subscribe to IAHIP web adverts (30% response rate; N = 120). Data were analysed using SPSS and thematic analysis. Findings Just under half these Irish psychotherapists reported recording client sessions during training; this practice being significantly less common amongst recent graduates. While a small majority agreed with recording during training, a sizeable one‐third disagreed, with others uncertain. Those with regular experience of recording were most supportive of the practice. Positive themes regarding recording were as follows: “strongly enables learning,” “captures reality,” “invaluable opportunity for trainees to have a witness,” and “accountability and protection for clients,” while negative themes were as follows: “an anxious, inhibiting experience,” “distorts/misses reality,” “trainees’ needs impinging on the therapeutic relationship” and “a breach of confidentiality.” Conclusion Irish psychotherapists have strong yet mixed views about recording, reflecting the power of this practice and its ethical complexity. A recommended training protocol for recording client sessions is offered.