Premium
An exploratory qualitative study of values issues associated with training and practice in pluralistic counselling
Author(s) -
Tilley Ellen,
McLeod Julia,
McLeod John
Publication year - 2015
Publication title -
counselling and psychotherapy research
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.38
H-Index - 32
eISSN - 1746-1405
pISSN - 1473-3145
DOI - 10.1002/capr.12033
Subject(s) - honesty , psychology , pluralism (philosophy) , qualitative research , thematic analysis , value (mathematics) , social psychology , perspective (graphical) , epistemology , sociology , social science , philosophy , machine learning , artificial intelligence , computer science
Background A pluralistic model of practice has become increasingly influential in recent years. A distinctive feature of this approach is its explicit grounding within a philosophical and moral perspective. Aim The aim of this study was to investigate issues and challenges that pluralistic counsellors experience in relation to values dilemmas that arise in practice. Methodology Twelve practitioners, of various experience levels, who identified as pluralistic counsellors, were invited to take part in semi‐structured interviews. Transcripts were analysed using a method of thematic analysis. Findings Participants viewed their personal values to be compatible with the values that they perceived pluralistic counselling to hold, and reported that they chose pluralism as a modality because they found a similarity between their personal values and the values of pluralistic counselling. Core values associated with pluralistic practice included the following: the importance of connection, ‘there is no one right way to be’, equality (not taking an expert role), honesty, and willingness to make use of research evidence. Participants also described value dilemmas, and their use of supervision in dealing with value issues. Implications The implications of these findings for training, research and practice are discussed.