Open AccessAssociations between advanced cancer patients' survival and family caregiver presence and burden
Author(s) -
DionneOdom J. Nicholas,
Hull Jay G.,
Martin Michelle Y.,
Lyons Kathleen Doyle,
Prescott Anna T.,
Tosteson Tor,
Li Zhongze,
Akyar Imatullah,
Raju Dheeraj,
Bakitas Marie A.
Publication year - 2016
Publication title -
cancer medicine
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.403
H-Index - 53
ISSN - 2045-7634
DOI - 10.1002/cam4.653
Subject(s) - medicine , caregiver burden , marital status , randomized controlled trial , quality of life (healthcare) , proportional hazards model , caregiver stress , survival analysis , depression (economics) , cancer , gerontology , population , disease , nursing , dementia , environmental health , economics , macroeconomics
Abstract We conducted a randomized controlled trial (RCT) of an early palliative care intervention (ENABLE: E ducate, N urture, A dvise, B efore L ife E nds) for persons with advanced cancer and their family caregivers. Not all patient participants had a caregiver coparticipant; hence, we explored whether there were relationships between patient survival, having an enrolled caregiver, and caregiver outcomes prior to death. One hundred and twenty‐three patient‐caregiver dyads and 84 patients without a caregiver coparticipant participated in the ENABLE early versus delayed (12 weeks later) RCT. We collected caregiver quality‐of‐life (QOL), depression, and burden (objective, stress, and demand) measures every 6 weeks for 24 weeks and every 3 months thereafter until the patient's death or study completion. We conducted survival analyses using log‐rank and Cox proportional hazards models. Patients with a caregiver coparticipant had significantly shorter survival (Wald = 4.31, HR = 1.52, CI: 1.02–2.25, P = 0.04). After including caregiver status, marital status (married/unmarried), their interaction, and relevant covariates, caregiver status (Wald = 6.25, HR = 2.62, CI: 1.23–5.59, P = 0.01), being married (Wald = 8.79, HR = 2.92, CI: 1.44–5.91, P = 0.003), and their interaction (Wald = 5.18, HR = 0.35, CI: 0.14–0.87, P = 0.02) were significant predictors of lower patient survival. Lower survival in patients with a caregiver was significantly related to higher caregiver demand burden (Wald = 4.87, CI: 1.01–1.20, P = 0.03) but not caregiver QOL, depression, and objective and stress burden. Advanced cancer patients with caregivers enrolled in a clinical trial had lower survival than patients without caregivers; however, this mortality risk was mostly attributable to higher survival by unmarried patients without caregivers. Higher caregiver demand burden was also associated with decreased patient survival.