Open AccessMetabolic dysfunction and obesity‐related cancer: Results from the cross‐sectional National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey
Author(s) -
Winn Maci,
Karra Prasoona,
Haaland Benjamin,
Doherty Jennifer A.,
Summers Scott A.,
Litchman Michelle L.,
Gunter Marc J.,
Playdon Mary C.,
Hardikar Sheetal
Publication year - 2023
Publication title -
cancer medicine
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.403
H-Index - 53
ISSN - 2045-7634
DOI - 10.1002/cam4.4912
Subject(s) - medicine , metabolic syndrome , obesity , national health and nutrition examination survey , odds ratio , abdominal obesity , hypertriglyceridemia , cancer , cross sectional study , risk factor , confidence interval , cholesterol , environmental health , triglyceride , population , pathology
Background Metabolic syndrome (MetS), a group of risk factors that define metabolic dysfunction in adults, is strongly associated with obesity and is an emerging risk factor for cancer. However, the association of MetS and degree of metabolic dysfunction with obesity‐related cancer is unknown. Methods Using National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey data from 1999 to 2018, we identified 528 obesity‐related cancer cases and 18,972 cancer‐free participants. MetS was defined as the presence of or treatment for ≥3 of hyperglycemia, hypertension, hypertriglyceridemia, low HDL–cholesterol, and abdominal obesity. A metabolic syndrome score (MSS) was computed as the total number of abnormal MetS parameters to determine the severity of metabolic dysfunction. Odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated using multivariable logistic regression models, adjusting for sociodemographic and lifestyle factors. Results About 45.7% of obesity‐related cancer cases were classified as having MetS compared with only 33.0% of cancer‐free participants. Overall, MetS and MSS were not associated with obesity‐related cancer. However, MSS was associated with higher obesity‐related cancer risk among participants under 50 years of age (OR [95% CI] = 1.28 [1.08–1.52]). When evaluating MSS categorically, compared with healthy participants with no abnormal MetS parameters (MSS = 0), participants with one or two abnormal parameters had a statistically significant higher risk of obesity‐related cancer (OR [95% CI] = 1.73 [1.06–2.83]). Conclusions Metabolic dysfunction is associated with a higher risk of obesity‐related cancer, particularly in young adults under 50 years of age, and among participants with one or two abnormal metabolic parameters. A more accurate indicator of metabolic dysfunction, beyond metabolic syndrome, is needed to better assist in stratifying individuals for obesity‐related cancer risk.