Open AccessBreast cancer incidence and menopausal hormone therapy in Norway from 2004 to 2009: a register‐based cohort study
Author(s) -
Suhrke Pål,
Zahl PerHenrik
Publication year - 2015
Publication title -
cancer medicine
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.403
H-Index - 53
ISSN - 2045-7634
DOI - 10.1002/cam4.474
Subject(s) - medicine , breast cancer , tibolone , incidence (geometry) , oncology , hazard ratio , cancer , proportional hazards model , gynecology , cancer registry , population , ductal carcinoma , mammography , estrogen , cohort , hormone therapy , confidence interval , physics , environmental health , optics
In Norway, the breast cancer incidence increased by 50% in the 1990s, during a period with initiation of mammography screening as well as a fourfold increase in use of menopausal hormone therapy ( HT ). After 2002, the HT use has dropped substantially; however, the breast cancer incidence has declined only marginally. How much mammography screening contributed to the breast cancer incidence increase in the 1990s compared with HT use and specifically different types of HT use, has thus been discussed. Whether HT affects the incidence of subtypes of breast cancer differently has also been questioned. We have linked individual data from several national registries from 2004 to 2009 on 449,717 women aged 50–65 years. 4597 cases of invasive cancer and 681 cases of ductal carcinoma in situ ( DCIS ) were included in the analysis. We used Cox regression to estimate hazard ratio ( HR ) as a measure of the relative risk of breast cancer associated with use of HT . The HR s associated with prescriptions of HT for more than 1 year were 2.06 (1.90–2.24) for estrogen and progesterone combinations, 1.03 (0.85–1.25) for systemic estrogens, and 1.23 (1.01–1.51) for tibolone. Invasive lobular carcinoma was more strongly associated with use of estrogen and progesterone combinations, HR = 3.10 (2.51–3.81), than nonlobular carcinoma, HR = 1.94 (1.78–2.12). The corresponding value for DCIS was 1.61 (1.28–2.02). We estimated the population attributable fraction to 8.2%, corresponding to 90 breast cancer cases in 2006 indicating that HT use still caused a major number of breast cancer cases.