z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Treatment optimization for recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma: Repeat hepatic resection versus radiofrequency ablation
Author(s) -
Lu LiangHe,
Mei Jie,
Kan Anna,
Ling YiHong,
Li ShaoHua,
Wei Wei,
Chen MinShan,
Zhang YongFa,
Guo RongPing
Publication year - 2020
Publication title -
cancer medicine
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.403
H-Index - 53
ISSN - 2045-7634
DOI - 10.1002/cam4.2951
Subject(s) - medicine , propensity score matching , radiofrequency ablation , hepatocellular carcinoma , milan criteria , gastroenterology , multivariate analysis , subgroup analysis , overall survival , ablation , surgery , oncology , confidence interval , liver transplantation , transplantation
Background and aims The optimal treatment strategy for recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) remains unclear. Therefore, we aimed to compare the outcomes of repeat hepatic resection (RHR) and radiofrequency ablation (RFA) for recurrent HCC. Method From December 2004 to December 2015, 138 patients who underwent RHR and 194 patients who underwent RFA were enrolled. Propensity score matching (PSM) was performed to establish 1:1 RHR‐RFA group matching. Clinical outcomes were compared before and after matching. Results Before matching, the 1‐, 3‐, and 5‐year postrecurrence survival (PRS) rates were 91.8%, 82.0%, and 72.9% for the RHR group (n = 138) and 94.4%, 75.4%, and 61.7% for the RFA group (n = 194), respectively ( P  = .380). After matching, the PRS rates at 1, 3, and 5 years were 90.5%, 81.5%, and 71.8% for the RHR group (n = 120) and 91.0%, 61.0%, and 41.7% for the RFA group (n = 120), respectively ( P  = .002). In the subgroup analysis, the PRS rates for the RHR group were better than those for the RFA group for patients who relapsed within 2 years ( P  = .004) or patients with primary tumor burden beyond the Milan criteria ( P  = .004). Multivariate analysis showed that treatment allocation was identified as an independent prognostic factor for PRS. Conclusion Compared with RFA, RHR provided a survival advantage for recurrent HCC, especially for patients who relapsed within 2 years and those with primary tumor burden beyond the Milan criteria.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here