
Let‐7 micro RNA ‐binding‐site polymorphism in the 3′ UTR of KRAS and colorectal cancer outcome: a systematic review and meta‐analysis
Author(s) -
Langevin Scott M.,
Christensen Brock C.
Publication year - 2014
Publication title -
cancer medicine
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.403
H-Index - 53
ISSN - 2045-7634
DOI - 10.1002/cam4.279
Subject(s) - kras , colorectal cancer , medicine , cancer
There is a small but growing body of literature regarding the predictive utility of a Let‐7 micro RNA ‐binding‐site polymorphism in the 3′‐untranslated region (UTR) of KRAS ( KRAS ‐ LCS 6 ) for colorectal cancer outcome, although the results are conflicting. We performed a review and meta‐analysis in an attempt to better clarify this relationship. A PubMed search was conducted to identify all studies reporting on KRAS let‐7 micro RNA ‐ binding site polymorphism ( LCS 6 ; rs61764370) and colorectal cancer outcome. Hazard ratios ( HR ) and corresponding 95% confidence intervals ( CI ) were extracted or estimated from each manuscript. Log HR s and log CI s were combined across studies using the inverse‐variance weight to calculate fixed‐ and random‐effects summary estimates and corresponding 95% CI s for overall and progression‐free survival. We did not observe any significant association between overall or progression‐free survival, neither when considering all colorectal cancer patients nor for subgroup analyses (metastatic, anti‐ EGFR [epidermal growth factor receptor] treatment, or KRAS wild type). There was substantial heterogeneity across studies, overall and among subgroups analyzed. We have found no clear evidence to support an association between the KRAS ‐ LCS 6 genotype and overall or progression‐free survival among colorectal cancer patients, even after conducting subgroup analyses by stage and anti‐ EGFR treatment status. This information helps to clarify the confusing body of literature regarding the clinical implications of the KRAS ‐ LCS 6 genetic variant on colorectal cancer outcomes, indicating that it should not be used at the present time to personalize therapeutic strategies ( PROSPERO registration number: CRD 42013005325).