
A phase I/ II pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics study of irinotecan combined with S−1 for recurrent/metastatic breast cancer in patients with selected UGT 1A1 genotypes (the JBCRG ‐M01 study)
Author(s) -
Ishiguro Hiroshi,
Saji Shigehira,
Nomura Shogo,
Tanaka Sunao,
Ueno Takayuki,
Onoue Masahide,
Iwata Hiroji,
Yamanaka Takeharu,
Sasaki Yasutsuna,
Toi Masakazu
Publication year - 2017
Publication title -
cancer medicine
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.403
H-Index - 53
ISSN - 2045-7634
DOI - 10.1002/cam4.1258
Subject(s) - irinotecan , pharmacokinetics , medicine , pharmacodynamics , metastatic breast cancer , breast cancer , gastroenterology , refractory (planetary science) , cancer , oncology , pharmacology , colorectal cancer , biology , astrobiology
S‐1 and irinotecan combination is attractive for breast cancer refractory to anthracyclines and taxanes. Patients with advanced human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 ( HER 2)‐negative breast cancer previously treated with anthracyclines and taxanes were eligible. Patients with brain metastases and homozygous for UGT 1A1 *6 or *28 or compound heterozygous (* 6 / *28 ) were excluded. A dose‐escalation design was chosen for the phase I portion (level 1: irinotecan 80 mg/m 2 days 1–8 and S‐1 80 mg/m 2 days 1–14 every 3 weeks; level 2: irinotecan 100 mg/m 2 and S‐1 80 mg/m 2 ). Study objectives included determination of the recommended dose for phase II , response rate, progression‐free survival ( PFS ), and safety. Pharmacokinetics and CD 34 + circulating endothelial cells ( CEC s) as pharmacodynamics were also analyzed. Thirty‐seven patients were included. One patient at each level developed dose‐limiting toxicities; therefore, level 2 was the recommended dose for phase II . Diarrhea was more common in patients possessing a *6 or *28 allele compared with wild‐type homozygous patients (46% and 25%). Among 29 patients treated at level 2, PFS was longer for UGT 1A1 wt/*6 and wt/*28 patients than for wt / wt patients (12 vs. 8 months, P = 0.06). PFS was significantly longer in patients with a larger‐than‐median SN ‐38 area under the curve ( AUC ) than in those with a smaller AUC ( P = 0.039). There was an association between clinical benefit and reduction in baseline CD 34 + CEC s by S‐1 ( P = 0.047). The combination of irinotecan and S‐1 is effective and warrants further investigation.