z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Personal use of hair dyes and risk of leukemia: a systematic literature review and meta‐analysis
Author(s) -
Towle Kevin M.,
Grespin Matthew E.,
Monnot Andrew D.
Publication year - 2017
Publication title -
cancer medicine
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.403
H-Index - 53
ISSN - 2045-7634
DOI - 10.1002/cam4.1162
Subject(s) - hair dyes , meta analysis , relative risk , medicine , leukemia , confidence interval , risk factor , dermatology , surgery , chemistry , organic chemistry , dyeing
The objective of this study was to examine the association between personal use of hair dyes and the risk of leukemia. We conducted a systematic literature review of epidemiology studies reporting leukemia‐specific cancer risks among hair dye users, and estimated the meta‐relative risk (meta‐ RR ) and corresponding 95% confidence interval (95% CI ) of leukemia, comparing hair dye users to nonusers. When data from all 20 studies that met the inclusion criteria were combined, ever use of hair dye was associated with a nonstatistically significant increased risk of leukemia, meta‐ RR  = 1.09 (95% CI : 0.97–1.22). When restricted to studies that adjusted for smoking, ever use of hair dye was not associated with leukemia, meta‐ RR  = 0.99 (95% CI : 0.76–1.29). A statistically significant increased risk of leukemia was associated with permanent hair dye use (meta‐ RR  = 1.19 [95% CI : 1.07–1.33]), dark hair dye use (meta‐ RR  = 1.29 [95% CI : 1.11–1.50]), hair dye use among males (meta‐ RR  = 1.42 [95% CI : 1.01–2.00]), hair dye use pre‐1980 (meta‐ RR  = 1.49 [95% CI : 1.21–1.83]), and hair dye use for ≥15 years (meta‐ RR  = 1.35 [95% CI : 1.13–1.62]). Overall, findings suggest that ever use of hair dye is not a significant risk factor for leukemia. Certain hair dye use characteristics were associated with a statistically significant increased risk, but further research is required to determine whether these associations truly reflect a risk of leukemia due to methodological limitations in the underlying studies.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here