Premium
Three‐dimensional femoral head coverage in the standing position represents that measured in vivo during gait
Author(s) -
Uemura Keisuke,
Atkins Penny R.,
Maas Steve A.,
Peters Christopher L.,
Anderson Andrew E.
Publication year - 2018
Publication title -
clinical anatomy
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.667
H-Index - 71
eISSN - 1098-2353
pISSN - 0897-3806
DOI - 10.1002/ca.23262
Subject(s) - medicine , gait , supine position , femoral head , magnetic resonance imaging , osteoarthritis , fluoroscopy , radiography , physical medicine and rehabilitation , nuclear medicine , orthodontics , anatomy , radiology , surgery , alternative medicine , pathology
Individuals with over‐ or under‐covered hips may develop hip osteoarthritis. Femoral head coverage is typically evaluated using radiographs, and/or computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance images obtained supine. Yet, these static assessments of coverage may not provide accurate information regarding the dynamic, three‐dimensional (3‐D) relationship between the femoral head and acetabulum. The objectives of this study were to: (1) quantify total and regional 3‐D femoral head coverage in a standing position and during gait, and (2) quantify the relationship between 3‐D femoral head coverage in standing to that measured during gait. The kinematic position of the hip during standing and gait was measured in vivo for 11 asymptomatic morphologically normal subjects using dual fluoroscopy and model‐based tracking of 3‐D CT models. Percent coverage in the standing position and during gait was measured overall and on a regional basis (anterior, superior, posterior, inferior). Coverage in standing was correlated with that measured during gait. For total coverage, very little change in coverage occurred during gait (range: 35.0–36.7%; mean: 36.2%). Coverage at each time point of gait strongly correlated with coverage during standing (r = 0.929–0.989). The regions thought to play an important role in weight bearing (i.e. anterior, superior, posterior) were significantly correlated with coverage in standing during the stance phase. Our results suggest that coverage measured in a standing position is a good surrogate for coverage measured during gait. Clin. Anat. 31:1177–1183, 2018. © 2018 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.