Premium
Internal and external morphology of mandibular molars: An original micro‐ CT study and meta‐analysis with review of implications for endodontic therapy
Author(s) -
Tomaszewska Iwona M.,
Skinningsrud Bendik,
Jarzębska Anna,
Pękala Jakub R.,
Tarasiuk Jacek,
Iwanaga Joe
Publication year - 2018
Publication title -
clinical anatomy
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.667
H-Index - 71
eISSN - 1098-2353
pISSN - 0897-3806
DOI - 10.1002/ca.23080
Subject(s) - medicine , root canal , molar , cone beam computed tomography , apical foramen , dentistry , foramen , orthodontics , endodontic therapy , mandible (arthropod mouthpart) , mandibular second molar , computed tomography , anatomy , biology , radiology , botany , genus
The aim of this radiological micro‐CT study and meta‐analysis was to determine the morphological features of the root canal anatomy of the mandibular molars. The radiological study included micro‐CT scans of 108 mandibular first, 120 mandibular second, and 146 mandibular third molars. For our meta‐analysis, an extensive search was conducted through PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science to identify articles eligible for inclusion. Data extracted included investigative method (cadaveric, intraoperative, or imaging), Vertucci type of canal configuration, presence/number of canals, roots, apical foramina, apical deltas, and intercanal communications. In the mesial roots of mandibular molars, the most frequent Vertucci type of canal configuration was type IV, except for the mandibular third molar where type I was most common. Type I was most common in the distal root. There were usually two canals in the mesial root and one in the distal root. Two was the most common number of roots, and a third root was most prevalent in Asia. One apical foramen was most common in the distal root and two apical foramina in the mesial root. Intercanal communications were most frequent in the mesial root. Knowledge of the complex anatomy of the mandibular molars can make root canal therapy more likely to succeed. We recommend the use of cone‐beam computed tomography before and after endodontic treatment to enable the root anatomy to be accurately described and properly diagnosed, and treatment outcome to be assessed. Clin. Anat. 31:797–811, 2018. © 2018 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.