Premium
Beware of the predatory science journal: A potential threat to the integrity of medical research
Author(s) -
Johal Jaspreet,
Ward Robert,
Gielecki Jerzy,
Walocha Jerzy,
Natsis Kostantinos,
Tubbs R. Shane,
Loukas Marios
Publication year - 2017
Publication title -
clinical anatomy
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.667
H-Index - 71
eISSN - 1098-2353
pISSN - 0897-3806
DOI - 10.1002/ca.22899
Subject(s) - credibility , publication , scientific misconduct , publishing , medicine , research integrity , internet privacy , public relations , political science , alternative medicine , law , computer science , pathology
The issue of predatory journals has become increasingly more prevalent over the past decade, as the open‐access model of publishing has gained prominence. Although the open‐access model is well intentioned to increase accessibility of biomedical research, it is vulnerable to exploitation by those looking to corrupt medical academia and circumvent ethics and research standards. Predatory journals will achieve publication by either soliciting unsuspecting researchers who have legitimate research but fall victim to these predators or researchers looking to quickly publish their research without a thorough review process. Some features of predatory journals are a quick non‐peer‐review process, falsely listing or exaggerating the credibility of editorial board members, and either lack of or falsification of institutional affiliations and database listings. These predatory journals are a serious threat to the integrity of medical research, as they will infect the available literature with unsubstantiated articles, and allow low‐quality research. A number of steps can be taken to prevent the spread and increase awareness of predatory publishers, and these must be done to maintain the integrity of medical academia. Clin. Anat. 30:767–773, 2017. © 2017Wiley Periodicals, Inc.