Premium
Surgical anatomy of round window and its implications for cochlear implantation
Author(s) -
Singla A.,
Sahni D.,
Gupta A.K.,
Loukas M.,
Aggarwal A.
Publication year - 2014
Publication title -
clinical anatomy
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.667
H-Index - 71
eISSN - 1098-2353
pISSN - 0897-3806
DOI - 10.1002/ca.22339
Subject(s) - medicine , anatomy , round window , cadaveric spasm , jugular foramen , temporal bone , internal carotid artery , dissection (medical) , facial nerve , lumen (anatomy) , oval window , nuclear medicine , middle ear , stapes , cochlea , surgery , skull
The objective of this work was to study the morphometry and morphology of the round window (RW) and its relationships with the internal carotid artery, jugular bulb (JB), facial nerve and oval window (OW). Fifty cadaveric temporal bones were microdissected to expose the medial wall of the middle ear. The areas around the RW were cleared and its shape, height and width were noted. Its distances from the carotid canal (CC), jugular fossa (JF), facial canal (FC), and OW were measured. Oval, round, triangular, comma, quadrangular, and pear shapes of RW were observed. The average height and width of the RW were 1.62 ± 0.77 mm and 1.15 ± 0.39 mm, respectively. There was a statistically significant correlation ( r = 0.4, P < 0.01) between the height and width. The distances between the RW and the CC, JF, FC, and OW were in the ranges 4.39–11.05 mm, 0.38–8.65 mm, 2.99–6.3 mm, and 1.39–3.57 mm, respectively. In 8% of cases, the distance between the RW and the JF was <1 mm. There were no statistically significant differences with regard to age group, gender, or side. Electrode insertion can be challenging in cases where the height and width of the RW are <1 mm. The thin bone separating the roof of the JF from the RW (<1 mm in 8%) highlights a potential risk of injury to the JB during cochleostomy placement. This information could be useful for selecting cochlear implant electrodes in order to avoid potential risks to vital neurovascular structures during implant surgery. Clin. Anat. 27:331–336, 2014. © 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.