Premium
A comparison of embalming fluids for use in surgical workshops
Author(s) -
Jaung Rebekah,
Cook Peter,
Blyth Phil
Publication year - 2011
Publication title -
clinical anatomy
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.667
H-Index - 71
eISSN - 1098-2353
pISSN - 0897-3806
DOI - 10.1002/ca.21118
Subject(s) - cadaver , embalming , medicine , anatomy , surgery
There is a growing need to learn surgical skills without risk to patients. One of the major determining factors on the suitability of specimens for surgical workshops is the fluid used for embalming. This study sought to compare three different arterial embalming preparations to a single fresh cadaver. Eleven cadavers embalmed using Graz (single cadaver), Dodge (four cadavers) and Genelyn (five cadavers) preparations were compared using four criteria; joint flexibility measured with a goniometer, tissue pliability rated on standardized videos of instrument handling, tissue color analyzed on standardized photographs and resistance to fungal growth identified by inoculation and observation of tissue blocks. The cadaver embalmed according to the Graz method had joint flexibility comparable to fresh tissue while the Dodge and Genelyn cadavers were less flexible. Tissue pliability was significantly affected by the Dodge and Genelyn methods while the Graz method tissue remained most like fresh tissue. The Graz method cadaver had color that was most akin to fresh tissue and the Dodge method cadavers were relatively more like fresh than the Genelyn. The Dodge and Genelyn method had quite similar fungicidal properties (3/11 Dodge and 2/9 Genelyn embalmed cadavers susceptible) while the Graz method cadaver did not grow mould. Variation exists between cadavers; however, the Graz method produced a cadaver with more flexible joints, better tissue quality and muscle color closest to the fresh specimen. The Dodge and Genelyn methods are similar with the exception of tissue color where the Dodge method was more similar to fresh tissue. Clin. Anat. 24:155–161, 2011. © 2011 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.