Premium
Three‐dimensional study of pectoralis major muscle and tendon architecture
Author(s) -
Fung Lillia,
Wong Brian,
Ravichandiran Kajeandra,
Agur Anne,
Rindlisbacher Tim,
Elmaraghy Amr
Publication year - 2009
Publication title -
clinical anatomy
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.667
H-Index - 71
eISSN - 1098-2353
pISSN - 0897-3806
DOI - 10.1002/ca.20784
Subject(s) - cadaveric spasm , medicine , anatomy , tendon , muscle belly , pectoralis major muscle , muscle architecture , cadaver , pectoralis muscle
Abstract A thorough understanding of the normal structural anatomy of the pectoralis major (PM) is of paramount importance in the planning of PM tendon transfers or repairs following traumatic PM tears. However, there is little consensus regarding the complex musculotendinous architecture of the PM in the anatomic or surgical literature. The purpose of this study is to model and quantify the three‐dimensional architecture of the pectoralis muscle and tendon. Eleven formalin embalmed cadaveric specimens were examined: five (2M/3F) were serially dissected, digitized, and modeled in 3D using Autodesk® Maya®; six (4M/2F) were dissected and photographed. The PM tendon consisted of longer anterior and shorter posterior layers that were continuous inferiorly. The muscle belly consisted of an architecturally uniform clavicular head (CH) and a segmented sternal head (SH) with 6–7 segments. The most inferior SH segment in all specimens was found to fold anteriorly forming a trough that cradled the inferior aspect of the adjacent superior segment. No twisting of either the PM muscle or tendon was noted. Within the CH, the fiber bundle lengths (FBL) were found to increase from superior to inferior, whereas the mean FBLs of SH were greatest in segments 3–5 found centrally. The mean lateral pennation angle was greater in the CH (29.4 ± 6.9°) than in the SH (20.6 ± 2.7°). The application of these findings could form the basis of future studies to optimize surgical planning and functional recovery of repair/reconstruction procedures. Clin. Anat. 22:500–508, 2009. © 2009 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.