z-logo
Premium
Alternative approaches for regional ulnar nerve blockade: A cadaveric study
Author(s) -
Lizamore N.,
Venter E.,
Boon J.M.
Publication year - 2004
Publication title -
clinical anatomy
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.667
H-Index - 71
eISSN - 1098-2353
pISSN - 0897-3806
DOI - 10.1002/ca.10247
Subject(s) - medicine , ulnar artery , ulnar nerve , flexor carpi ulnaris , wrist , cadaveric spasm , anatomy , cadaver , ulnar neuropathy , tendon , extensor carpi ulnaris , surgery , artery , radial artery , elbow
Wrist blockade is a safe and effective alternative to general anesthesia in surgery of hand injuries. With regard to the ulnar nerve, the volar approach is used, where the needle passes through or medial to the flexor carpi ulnaris tendon; however, the ulnar artery is at risk because the needle may accidentally penetrate it, causing profuse bleeding. Alternatively, the wrist may be approached medially, the ulnar approach, and the needle tip placed posterior to the flexor carpi ulnaris tendon. To determine which of these methods may be preferable for avoiding ulnar artery injury, needles were inserted into the wrist area of cadaver hands ( n = 57) using the volar and ulnar approaches; detailed dissection of the region around the inserted needles was subsequently carried out. The position of the ulnar nerve relative to the ulnar artery and injury to the artery was documented. Damage to the ulnar artery using the volar approach was 36.8% (21/57 cases) compared to no (0%) injury observed using the ulnar approach. At the level of the wrist crease just proximal to the pisiform bone, the ulnar nerve was medial to the artery in 92.9% (53/57) of cases, medial and posterior in 5.3% (3/57), and anterior to the artery in 1.8% (1/57) of cases. This study suggests that in cases where ulnar artery pulsation is not reliable, the ulnar approach may be preferable for ulnar nerve blockade due to an increased incidence of ulnar artery penetration with the volar approach. Clin. Anat. 17:373–377, 2004. © 2004 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here