z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Five challenges in altmetrics: A toolmaker's perspective
Author(s) -
Liu Jean,
Adie Euan
Publication year - 2013
Publication title -
bulletin of the american society for information science and technology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 1550-8366
pISSN - 0095-4403
DOI - 10.1002/bult.2013.1720390410
Subject(s) - computer science , altmetrics , relevance (law) , data science , ambiguity , information retrieval , context (archaeology) , social media , selection (genetic algorithm) , redundancy (engineering) , set (abstract data type) , world wide web , artificial intelligence , political science , law , biology , programming language , operating system , paleontology
Editor's Summary The experience of Altmetric LLP, an altmetric tool developer, reveals common issues that demand attention when designing alternative metrics for response to scholarly writings. Identifying what can and should be measured for different user groups is fundamental. A default is to count all relevant mentions in a set of online sources, permitting drill down for more qualitative information. Data source selection varies by need, ranging from government documents to social media comment sites. Since the topic of discussion can be elusive, a tracking method must point backward to original articles or data. Text mining helps for text documents, but audio and video are less workable. Multiple versions of a single article and subsections of books and datasets add ambiguity and redundancy. Valid interpretation depends on context and the relevance and timeliness of data and sources, requiring continual reassessment.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here