z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Building controlled vocabularies for metadata harmonization
Author(s) -
Zaharee Marcie
Publication year - 2012
Publication title -
bulletin of the american society for information science and technology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 1550-8366
pISSN - 0095-4403
DOI - 10.1002/bult.2013.1720390211
Subject(s) - controlled vocabulary , computer science , terminology , metadata , taxonomy (biology) , vocabulary , scope (computer science) , world wide web , simple knowledge organization system , information retrieval , semantic web , data science , rdf , sparql , philosophy , linguistics , botany , biology , programming language
Abstract Editor's Summary Organizations using controlled vocabularies are highly diverse, but they all rely on using a terminology list that is internally standardized, commonly understood and widely applied for metatagging. The basic steps for creating a controlled vocabulary, taxonomy or thesaurus are the same for each case, starting with determining the scope to be covered and identifying representative content sources. This step is followed by gathering and organizing terms, enhancing them with synonyms and relationships and often by subject‐matter‐expert review. Using a dedicated taxonomy management tool is recommended to facilitate management, visualization and export in machine‐readable format such as OWL or SKOS. Posting the controlled vocabulary to a registry or data warehouse enables sharing and may stimulate broad acceptance. The MITRE Corporation has followed this process in developing taxonomies consistent with the Department of Defense's Net‐Centric Data Strategy, which bases shared understanding within and among DoD programs on the use of controlled vocabularies and crosswalking equivalent data elements.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here