z-logo
Premium
Target concentration dependence of DNA melting temperature on oligonucleotide microarrays
Author(s) -
Ozel Ayse Bilge,
Srivannavit Onnop,
Rouillard JeanMarie,
Gulari Erdogan
Publication year - 2012
Publication title -
biotechnology progress
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.572
H-Index - 129
eISSN - 1520-6033
pISSN - 8756-7938
DOI - 10.1002/btpr.1505
Subject(s) - oligonucleotide , nucleic acid thermodynamics , dna microarray , dna , duplex (building) , melting temperature , analytical chemistry (journal) , chemistry , hybridization probe , molecule , reaction rate constant , materials science , base sequence , chromatography , kinetics , organic chemistry , biochemistry , gene , gene expression , composite material , physics , quantum mechanics
The design of microarrays is currently based on studies focusing on DNA hybridization reaction in bulk solution. However, the presence of a surface to which the probe strand is attached can make the solution‐based approximations invalid, resulting in sub‐optimum hybridization conditions. To determine the effect of surfaces on DNA duplex formation, the authors studied the dependence of DNA melting temperature (T m ) on target concentration. An automated system was developed to capture the melting profiles of a 25‐mer perfect‐match probe–target pair initially hybridized at 23°C. Target concentrations ranged from 0.0165 to 15 nM with different probe amounts (0.03–0.82 pmol on a surface area of 10 18 Å 2 ), a constant probe density (5 × 10 12 molecules/cm 2 ) and spacer length (15 dT). The authors found that T m for duplexes anchored to a surface is lower than in‐solution, and this difference increases with increasing target concentration. In a representative set, a target concentration increase from 0.5 to 15 nM with 0.82 pmol of probe on the surface resulted in a T m decrease of 6°C when compared with a 4°C increase in solution. At very low target concentrations, a multi‐melting process was observed in low temperature domains of the curves. This was attributed to the presence of truncated or mismatch probes. © 2012 American Institute of Chemical Engineers Biotechnol. Prog., 2012

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here