Premium
A survey of people's attitudes and beliefs about false confessions
Author(s) -
Henkel Linda A.,
Coffman Kimberly A. J.,
Dailey, B.A. Elizabeth M.
Publication year - 2008
Publication title -
behavioral sciences and the law
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.649
H-Index - 74
eISSN - 1099-0798
pISSN - 0735-3936
DOI - 10.1002/bsl.826
Subject(s) - confession (law) , situational ethics , interrogation , psychology , social psychology , context (archaeology) , perception , jury , law , paleontology , neuroscience , political science , biology
Abstract The attitudes and beliefs of jury eligible individuals regarding false confessions were investigated in order to uncover potential biases. Survey respondents provided perceptions of factors related to false confessions (e.g. their frequency and likely situational and dispositional risk variables). Results indicate that people possess an awareness that false confessions can occur and believe that a confession should not be taken as an absolute indicator of guilt. However, their understanding of predisposing and situational factors that contribute to false confessions was incomplete, as was their understanding of interrogation practices. Furthermore, respondents showed a marked bias against believing that they personally would ever falsely confess, which is discussed in the context of potential inconsistencies between people's self‐report and their actual behaviors in naturalistic situations. Copyright © 2008 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.