Premium
The effects of defendant race, victim race, and juror gender on evidence processing in a murder trial
Author(s) -
ForsterLee Robert,
ForsterLee Lynne,
Horowitz Irwin A.,
King Ellen
Publication year - 2006
Publication title -
behavioral sciences and the law
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.649
H-Index - 74
eISSN - 1099-0798
pISSN - 0735-3936
DOI - 10.1002/bsl.675
Subject(s) - race (biology) , punitive damages , psychology , jury , criminology , context (archaeology) , white (mutation) , poison control , social psychology , law , medicine , political science , sociology , gender studies , medical emergency , paleontology , biochemistry , chemistry , gene , biology
The effects of defendant race, victim race, and juror gender on sentencing and information processing were examined within the context of a murder trial. A sample consisting of 96, jury eligible White Australians read one of four versions of a real trial transcript, in which the race of a male defendant and female victim were varied. The participants imposed the severest sentences on the Indigenous (Black) defendant. Jurors were most lenient with White defendants who killed a White victim. Female jurors were more punitive than the males toward the Indigenous defendant. Jurors processed evidence systematically in same‐race trials, but used both systematic and heuristic processing in mixed‐race trials. In these instances, female jurors employed significantly more emotive responses, especially when the victim was Black. The effects of subtle racism and the black processing effect when the victim was non‐White are considered. Copyright © 2006 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.