z-logo
Premium
Diversion of mentally disordered offenders: A legitimate role for clinicians?
Author(s) -
Rogers Richard,
Bagby R. Michael
Publication year - 1992
Publication title -
behavioral sciences and the law
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.649
H-Index - 74
eISSN - 1099-0798
pISSN - 0735-3936
DOI - 10.1002/bsl.2370100310
Subject(s) - mentally ill , psychology , outcome (game theory) , psychiatry , criminology , medicine , mental health , mental illness , mathematics , mathematical economics
Consultations to the courts often extend beyond criminal competencies and may include implicit statements regarding the diversion of mentally disordered offenders to treatment facilities. Arguments for diversion are based on humanitarian interests and treatment needs. Arguments opposing diversion recommendations emphasize (a) the variability of opinions regarding treatability, (b) the lack of sufficient outcome data, and (c) the potential for negative consequences in offering unsolicited opinions on diversion. Initial data from 271 pretrial evaluations underscore the range in psychiatric use of diversion recommendations, although inpatient referrals in particular appear to be based on clinical status.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here