z-logo
Premium
Environmental regulation and innovation driving ecological design in the UK automotive industry
Author(s) -
Smith Mark,
Crotty Jo
Publication year - 2008
Publication title -
business strategy and the environment
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 2.123
H-Index - 105
eISSN - 1099-0836
pISSN - 0964-4733
DOI - 10.1002/bse.550
Subject(s) - dematerialization (economics) , ecological modernization , directive , automotive industry , industrial ecology , product (mathematics) , business , legislation , modernization theory , industrial organization , hazardous waste , ecological design , product design , design for the environment , process (computing) , environmental economics , economics , environmental resource management , engineering , sustainable development , computer science , ecology , political science , sustainability , law , economic growth , aerospace engineering , biology , microeconomics , geometry , programming language , operating system , mathematics , waste management
The theory of ecological modernization asserts that economic and environmental goals can be integrated within a framework of industrial modernity. Its central tenet is that environmental regulation can stimulate the application of ‘clean’ technologies or techniques. Ecological modernization also contends that environmental regulation can offer business benefits from innovation through improved product design and economic performance. The EU End of Life Vehicles Directive (ELVD) reflects many of these principles, as it compels all car manufacturers to ‘take back’ and dismantle vehicles at the end of their useful lives and to remove the hazardous substances from the production process. Each component will then be either reused or recycled. The legislation forces designers to introduce ‘clean design’ and ‘design for disassembly’ practices. In light of this, we examine the impact of the directive on UK automotive component manufacturers. We find limited evidence that the EU ELVD Directive has driven product innovation beyond short‐term, incremental technological trajectories. We therefore conclude that a more radical approach, in line with the ‘dematerialization’ thesis by Dobers and Wolff (1999), is needed to generate more radical, ecological design solutions within the UK automotive industry. Copyright © 2006 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd and ERP Environment.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here