Open AccessPosition selectivity in face‐sensitive visual cortex to facial and nonfacial stimuli: an fMRI study
Author(s) -
Nichols David F.,
Betts Lisa R.,
Wilson Hugh R.
Publication year - 2016
Publication title -
brain and behavior
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.915
H-Index - 41
ISSN - 2162-3279
DOI - 10.1002/brb3.542
Subject(s) - visual cortex , fusiform face area , voxel , visual field , psychology , stimulus (psychology) , lateralization of brain function , retinotopy , neuroscience , univariate , functional magnetic resonance imaging , artificial intelligence , fusiform gyrus , pattern recognition (psychology) , face perception , computer science , cognitive psychology , perception , multivariate statistics , machine learning
Background Evidence for position sensitivity in object‐selective visual areas has been building. On one hand, most of the relevant studies have utilized stimuli for which the areas are optimally selective and examine small sections of cortex. On the other hand, visual field maps established with nonspecific stimuli have been found in increasingly large areas of visual cortex, though generally not in areas primarily responsive to faces. Methods fMRI was used to study the position sensitivity of the occipital face area ( OFA ) and the fusiform face area ( FFA ) to both standard rotating wedge retinotopic mapping stimuli and quadrant presentations of synthetic facial stimuli. Analysis methods utilized were both typical, that is, mean univariate BOLD signals and multivoxel pattern analysis ( MVPA ), and novel, that is, distribution of voxels to pattern classifiers and use of responses to nonfacial retinotopic mapping stimuli to classify responses to facial stimuli. Results Polar angle sensitivity was exhibited to standard retinotopic mapping stimuli with a stronger contralateral bias in OFA than in FFA , a stronger bias toward the vertical meridian in FFA than in OFA , and a bias across both areas toward the inferior visual field. Contralateral hemispheric lateralization of both areas was again shown using synthetic face stimuli based on univariate BOLD signals, MVPA , and the biased contribution of voxels toward multivariate classifiers discriminating the contralateral visual field. Classifiers based on polar angle responsivity were used to classify the patterns of activation above chance levels to face stimuli in the OFA but not in the FFA . Conclusions Both the OFA and FFA exhibit quadrant sensitivity to face stimuli, though the OFA exhibits greater position responsivity across stimuli than the FFA and includes overlap in the response pattern to the disparate stimulus types. Such biases are consistent with varying position sensitivity along different surfaces of occipito‐temporal cortex.