z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis and retinal changes in optical coherence tomography: A systematic review and meta‐analysis
Author(s) -
Nepal Gaurav,
Kharel Sanjeev,
Coghlan Megan Ariel,
Yadav Jayant Kumar,
Parajuli Pawan,
Pandit Kamal,
Shing Yow Ka,
Ojha Rajeev
Publication year - 2022
Publication title -
brain and behavior
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.915
H-Index - 41
ISSN - 2162-3279
DOI - 10.1002/brb3.2741
Subject(s) - amyotrophic lateral sclerosis , medicine , nerve fiber layer , retinal , ophthalmology , optical coherence tomography , meta analysis , context (archaeology) , confidence interval , disease , pathology , paleontology , biology
Increasing evidence suggests Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (ALS) as a widespread pathological process comprising nonmotor features like fatigue, mild sensory symptoms, cognitive decline, and visual impairment. Measurements of retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) thickness using Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT) may correlate with the neurodegeneration associated with ALS. In addition to RNFL thickness, other OCT parameters have been explored in the context of diagnosing ALS and predicting disease severity. In this study, we explore the possibility that OCT parameters of patients with ALS may differ significantly from those of healthy controls and thus serve as biomarkers for the disease and its progression. Materials and methods Between 2010 and 2021, the PubMed and EMBASE databases were examined for English language literature. ALS severity was assessed using the revised ALS functional rating scale (ALSFRS‐R). The pooled mean differences in RNFL thickness between ALS patients and controls were calculated using the Standard Mean Difference (Hedges's g ) with a 95% confidence interval (CI) in STATA software version 16. Results Eleven studies were reviewed for data collection. RNFL thickness was not statistically significantly different between ALS patients ( n  = 412) and controls ( n  = 376) (Hedges's g  = –0.22; 95% CI: –0.51 to 0.07, I 2 = 73.04%, p  = .14). However, the thickness of inner nuclear layer was significantly different between ALS patients and controls (Hedges's g  = –0.38; 95% CI: –0.61 to 0.14, I 2 = 14.85%, p  = .00). Conclusion Our meta‐analysis found that RNFL thickness as a whole or by individual quadrants was not significantly different between ALS patients and controls while the inner nuclear layer (INL) was substantially thinner.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here