Open AccessAdjunctive bright light therapy for treating bipolar depression: A systematic review and meta‐analysis of randomized controlled trials
Author(s) -
Hirakawa Hirofumi,
Terao Takeshi,
Muronaga Masaaki,
Ishii Nobuyoshi
Publication year - 2020
Publication title -
brain and behavior
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.915
H-Index - 41
ISSN - 2162-3279
DOI - 10.1002/brb3.1876
Subject(s) - meta analysis , randomized controlled trial , medicine , light therapy , bipolar disorder , publication bias , depression (economics) , adjunctive treatment , medline , psychiatry , lithium (medication) , political science , economics , law , circadian rhythm , macroeconomics
Abstract Objectives Bright light therapy (BLT) was reported as an effective adjunctive treatment option for bipolar disorder. Previous meta‐analytic study showed that augmentation treatment with light therapy significantly decreased the severity of bipolar depression. However, most of included studies were case–control studies and several of them focused on BLT that was provided in combination with sleep deprivation therapy. Methods In this meta‐analysis, we used several electronic databases to search the studies and included only randomized controlled trial (RCT) studies to compare BLT with control experimental groups for treating bipolar depression with pharmacological treatment to clarify the adjunctive efficacy of BLT. We searched the databases of EMBASE, MEDLINE, Scopus, The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, the Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, and Clinicaltrials.gov for studies published in English until September 19, 2019. Two researchers conducted the literature screening, data extraction, and methodological quality assessment independently. The main outcome was the response rate and remission rate. We used the Review Manager 5.3 Software for the meta‐analysis. Results Four trials with a total of 190 participants (intervention: 94, control: 96) with bipolar depression were evaluated to gauge the effects of light therapy. The meta‐analysis showed risk ratios of 1.78 (95% CI 1.24–2.56, p = .002; I 2 = 17%) demonstrating a significant effect of light therapy in the response rate of bipolar disorder. The meta‐analysis shows risk ratios of 2.03 (95% CI 0.48–8.59, p = .34; I 2 = 67%) demonstrating no significant effect of light therapy in the remission rate of patients with bipolar disorder. None of the articles reported any serious adverse effects. Manic switch rate was 1.1% in the light therapy group and 1.2% in the control group. Conclusions Bright light therapy is an effective treatment for reducing depression symptoms among patients with bipolar depression.