z-logo
Premium
Effect of the biological matrix on the urinary testosterone/epitestosterone ratio measured by gas chromatography/mass spectrometry in doping analysis
Author(s) -
Linnet Kristian
Publication year - 1993
Publication title -
biological mass spectrometry
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.475
H-Index - 121
eISSN - 1096-9888
pISSN - 1052-9306
DOI - 10.1002/bms.1200220708
Subject(s) - epitestosterone , chemistry , calibration curve , chromatography , mass spectrometry , testosterone (patch) , matrix (chemical analysis) , gas chromatography , analytical chemistry (journal) , detection limit , endocrinology , androgen , hormone , medicine , biochemistry
Testosterone doping in sport is detected by measurement of an increased testosterone/epitestosterone (T/E) ratio in urine. The critical limit is 6. The present study concerns calibration curves for the T/E ratio measured by gas chromatography/mass spectrometry (electron impact) according to the guidelines of the International Olympic Committee. Testosterone (T) and epitestosterone (E) are measured as trimethylsilyl (TMS)‐enol‐TMS ethers in selected ion monitoring mode using m / z 432 with methyltestosterone (MT) ( m / z 446) as internal standard. Calibration curves corresponding to T/E = 1, 6 and 12 prepared directly, i.e. without extraction of T and E, were non‐linear. The non‐linearity was caused by an increase of the relative molar response of T with respect to the internal standard MT with increasing concentration level. A mean increase of 82% was observed from T/E = 1 to T/E = 12 (E fixed). Adding T/E corresponding to 1/1, 6/1 and 12/1 to urine without endogeneous hormone content resulted in an almost linear calibration curve along the diagonal, with only a slight increase of the relative molar response of testosterone (16% from T/E = 1 to 12). Apparently, the biological matrix stabilizes the relative molar response over a wide concentration range. At a molar ratio of about 1/1 for T/MT, the relative molar response for direct measurement of T is identical to that observed in the presence of urine matrix, which is explained on the basis of a simple mathematical model. The practical conclusion of this study is that, contrary to the present‐day practice, calibration curves for the T/E ratio should be based on T/E added to blank urine taken through the extraction procedure. Otherwise, the T/E ratio of urine sample is systematically easily underestimated by 30% or more.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom