z-logo
Premium
When both K m and V max are altered, Is the enzyme inhibited or activated?
Author(s) -
Silverstein Todd P.
Publication year - 2019
Publication title -
biochemistry and molecular biology education
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.34
H-Index - 39
eISSN - 1539-3429
pISSN - 1470-8175
DOI - 10.1002/bmb.21235
Subject(s) - enzyme , effector , activator (genetics) , chemistry , uncompetitive inhibitor , enzyme kinetics , michaelis–menten kinetics , stereochemistry , biophysics , biochemistry , enzyme assay , biology , active site , non competitive inhibition , gene
Enzyme activators lower K m (the Michaelis constant) and/or raise V max (the asymptotic reaction velocity at infinite substrate concentration); conversely, inhibitors raise K m and/or lower V max . But what if an effector moves both K m and V max in the same direction? Uncompetitive inhibitors, which decrease both K m and V max by the same factor, are the most common example of this. A less well‐known example occurs often when crowding agents are added to the buffer in order to mimic the environment commonly encountered in vivo . Crowding agents tested on different enzymes have been shown to have every conceivable effect on K m or V max , causing them to rise, fall, or stay the same. In this article, a mathematical analysis is presented allowing biochemists to judge whether an effector that causes K m and V max to both move in the same direction serves as an inhibitor, an activator, or most surprising, as both. © 2019 International Union of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, 47(4):446–449, 2019.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom