z-logo
Premium
Replacing lectures in conventional university courses by text‐based flexible learning can be a rewarding experience for the lecturer and students
Author(s) -
Green John
Publication year - 2005
Publication title -
biochemistry and molecular biology education
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.34
H-Index - 39
eISSN - 1539-3429
pISSN - 1470-8175
DOI - 10.1002/bmb.2005.494033032457
Subject(s) - mathematics education , perspective (graphical) , computer science , quality (philosophy) , quality assurance , psychology , medical education , artificial intelligence , engineering , medicine , philosophy , external quality assessment , epistemology , operations management
For nearly two decades, a proportion of lectures in certain modules in conventional undergraduate diploma and degree courses has been replaced by text‐based flexible learning. This flexible learning program has satisfied the various quality assurance procedures in place within the university throughout the period of implementation. Evaluation of students' performance and perceptions demonstrated that the text‐based flexible learning program was an effective alternative to lectures. The advantages and disadvantages of this flexible learning program from the lecturer's perspective are discussed.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom