Premium
Why does the word monitoring have such a strictive definition in policy Governance litrature?
Author(s) -
Carver John
Publication year - 2005
Publication title -
board leadership
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 1542-7862
pISSN - 1061-4249
DOI - 10.1002/bl.38620058205
Subject(s) - corporate governance , nothing , public administration , law and economics , business , political science , accounting , economics , finance , epistemology , philosophy
Long Before policy Governance, boards were monitoring staff performance, so receiving reports and taking them seriously is nothing new. So I am confused by the overly restrictive use of the word monitoring in Policy Governance literature. Why must it be so rigidly defined?