Premium
Influence of Different Catalyst Supporters and Polymers on Electrical Behavior of MWCNT Composites
Author(s) -
Park Suyoung,
Lee Seoungsoo,
Jeong Hakyung,
Jin Changhyun
Publication year - 2016
Publication title -
bulletin of the korean chemical society
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.237
H-Index - 59
ISSN - 1229-5949
DOI - 10.1002/bkcs.10818
Subject(s) - materials science , polypropylene , polyethylene , catalysis , ternary operation , polycarbonate , composite material , nanocomposite , carbon nanotube , polymer , dispersion (optics) , supporter , electrical resistivity and conductivity , chemical engineering , chemistry , organic chemistry , physics , computer science , optics , programming language , electrical engineering , archaeology , history , engineering
Four different polymer‐coated multi‐walled carbon nanotubes ( MWCNTs ) were prepared under various catalyst‐supporter conditions for examining the conductivity of the nanocomposites. The dimensions of the initial Al( OH ) 3 catalyst supporter, i.e ., one of the final ternary catalysts, mainly determined the pristine MWCNT properties. The respective MWCNT ‐based composites with polycarbonate, high‐density polyethylene, polypropylene, and low‐density polyethylene generally exhibited remarkable catalyst support‐dependent conductivity differences—approximately seven orders of magnitude, from 10 9.7 to 10 2.7 . The degree of MWCNT dispersion is considered the key factor inducing the significant electrical differences.