z-logo
Premium
Optimization of microalgal production in a shallow outdoor flume
Author(s) -
Laws Edward A.,
Taguchi Satoru,
Hirata Janice,
Pang Lance
Publication year - 1988
Publication title -
biotechnology and bioengineering
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.136
H-Index - 189
eISSN - 1097-0290
pISSN - 0006-3592
DOI - 10.1002/bit.260320204
Subject(s) - flume , zoology , algae , dry weight , photosynthesis , diatom , irradiance , botany , biology , horticulture , environmental science , mathematics , flow (mathematics) , geometry , physics , quantum mechanics
The marine diatom Cyclotella cryptica was grown over a period of 13 months in a 48‐m 2 shallow outdoor flume. The use of foil arrays at intervals of 1.2 m to effect systematic vertical mixing in the flume was found to significantly enhance microalgal production ( p = 0.006). Average photosynthetic efficiencies (based on visible irradiance) with and without the foil arrays in place were 9.6 ± 0.8 and 7.5 ± 0.5% (±95% confidence intervals), respectively. A cost–benefit analysis indicated that the foil arrays were cost‐effective if the value of the algae exceeded about $2.28 kg 1 of ash‐free dry weight (AFDW). Parallel experiments performed in four 9.2‐m 2 flumes showed that production was maximized when the cells were grown on a 2‐day batch cycle between harvests rather than on a 1‐ or 3‐day batch cycle. The optimum initial concentration (immediately after harvesting) of the algae was negatively correlated with the time interval between harvests and ranged from approximately 39 g AFDW/m 3 on a 3‐day cycle to 213 g AFDW/m 3 on a 1‐day cycle. The increase in production resulting from growth on a 2‐day rather than a 1‐day batch cycle was about 19% and was statistically significant at p = 0.0003. Growth of C. cryptica over a total period of 122 days during the 13‐month study in the 48‐m 2 flume under near‐optimal conditions (2‐day batch cycle, initial concentration 155 g AFDW/m 3 ) resulted in an average production rate (±95% confidence interval) of 29.7 ± 2.7 g AFDW/m 2 d.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here