z-logo
Premium
Comparative performance evaluation of conventional and two‐phase hydrophobic stirred tank reactors for methane abatement: Mass transfer and biological considerations
Author(s) -
Cantera Sara,
Estrada José M.,
Lebrero Raquel,
GarcíaEncina Pedro A.,
Muñoz Raúl
Publication year - 2016
Publication title -
biotechnology and bioengineering
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.136
H-Index - 189
eISSN - 1097-0290
pISSN - 0006-3592
DOI - 10.1002/bit.25897
Subject(s) - chemistry , continuous stirred tank reactor , dilution , mass transfer , biomass (ecology) , phase (matter) , population , silicone oil , chromatography , methane , chemical engineering , thermodynamics , ecology , organic chemistry , physics , demography , sociology , biology , engineering
ABSTRACT This study demonstrated for the first time the capability of methanotrophs to grow inside silicone oil (SO200) and identified the optimum cultivation conditions for enrichment of hydrophobic methanotrophs (high dilution rates (D) and low CH 4 transfer rates). The potential of the hydrophobic methanotrophs enriched was assessed in a single‐phase stirred tank reactor (1P‐STR) and in a two‐phase stirred tank reactor (2P‐STR). Different operational conditions were systematically evaluated in both reactors (SO200 fractions of 30 and 60 %, stirring rates of 250 and 500 rpm, and D of 0.1–0.35 day −1 with and without biomass retention). The results showed that the TPPB only supported a superior CH 4 abatement performance compared to the 1P‐STR (40% enhancement at 250 rpm and 25% enhancement at 500 rpm) at a D of 0.3 day −1 due to the retention of the biocatalytic activity inside the SO200, while the 1P‐STR achieved higher elimination capacities (EC up to ≈3 times) than the TPPB under the rest of conditions tested (EC max  = 91.1 g m −3  h −1 ). Furthermore, the microscopic examination and DGGE‐sequencing of the communities showed that the presence of SO200 influenced the microbial population structure, impacting on bacterial biodiversity and favoring the growth of methanotrophs such as Methylosarcina . Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2016;113: 1203–1212. © 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here