Premium
Immobilization of enzymes using non‐ionic colloidal liquid aphrons (CLAs): Activity kinetics, conformation, and energetics
Author(s) -
Ward Keeran,
Xi Jingshu,
Stuckey David C.
Publication year - 2016
Publication title -
biotechnology and bioengineering
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.136
H-Index - 189
eISSN - 1097-0290
pISSN - 0006-3592
DOI - 10.1002/bit.25865
Subject(s) - chemistry , enzyme , lipase , chymotrypsin , kinetics , chromatography , immobilized enzyme , desorption , enzyme kinetics , ionic strength , aprotinin , ionic liquid , enzyme assay , subtilisin , trypsin , aqueous solution , biochemistry , active site , organic chemistry , catalysis , adsorption , medicine , physics , surgery , quantum mechanics
This study seeks to examine the ability of non‐ionic/non‐polar Colloidial Liquid Aphrons (CLAs) to preserve enzyme functionality upon immobilization and release. CLAs consisting of micron‐sized oil droplets surrounded by a thin aqueous layer stabilized by a mixture of surfactants, were formulated by direct addition (pre‐manufacture addition) using 1% Tween 80/mineral oil and 1% Tween 20 and the enzymes lipase, aprotinin and α‐chymotrypsin. The results of activity assays for both lipase and α‐chymotrypsin showed that kinetic activity increased upon immobilization by factors of 7 and 5.5, respectively, while aprotinin retained approximately 85% of its native activity. The conformation of the enzymes released through desorption showed no significant alterations compared to their native state. Changes in pH and temperature showed that optimum conditions did not change after immobilization, while analysis of activation energy for the immobilized enzyme showed an increase in activity at higher temperatures. Furthermore, the effect of bound water within the aphron structure allowed for some degree of enzyme hydration, and this hydration was needed for an active conformation with results showing a decrease in ΔH* for the immobilized system compared to its native counterpart. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2016;113: 970–978. © 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.