Premium
The continuum heterogeneous biofilm model with multiple limiting substrate Monod kinetics
Author(s) -
Gonzo Elio Emilio,
Wuertz Stefan,
Rajal Veronica B.
Publication year - 2014
Publication title -
biotechnology and bioengineering
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.136
H-Index - 189
eISSN - 1097-0290
pISSN - 0006-3592
DOI - 10.1002/bit.25284
Subject(s) - biofilm , thiele modulus , thermal diffusivity , chemistry , thermodynamics , kinetics , diffusion , function (biology) , homogeneous , physics , genetics , quantum mechanics , evolutionary biology , bacteria , biology
We describe a novel procedure to estimate the net growth rate of biofilms on multiple substrates. The approach is based on diffusion‐reaction mass balances for chemical species in a continuum biofilm model with reaction kinetics corresponding to a Double‐Monod expression. This analytical model considers a heterogeneous biofilm with variable distributions of biofilm density, activity, and effective diffusivity as a function of depth. We present the procedure to estimate the effectiveness factor analytically and compare the outcome with values obtained by the application of a rigorous numerical computational method using several theoretical examples and a test case. A comparison of the profiles of the effectiveness factor as a function of the Thiele modulus, φ , revealed that the activity of a homogeneous biofilm could be as much as 42% higher than that of a heterogeneous biofilm, under the given conditions. The maximum relative error between numerical and estimated effectiveness factor was 2.03% at φ near 0.7 (corresponding to a normalized Thiele modulus φ * = 1). For φ < 0.3 or φ > 1.4, the relative error was less than 0.5%. A biofilm containing aerobic ammonium oxidizers was chosen as a test case to illustrate the model's capability. We assumed a continuum heterogeneous biofilm model where the effective diffusivities of oxygen and ammonium change with biofilm position. Calculations were performed for two scenarios; Case I had low dissolved oxygen (DO) concentrations and Case II had high DO concentrations, with a concentration at the biofilm–fluid interface of 10 g O 2 /m 3 . For Case II, ammonium was the limiting substrate for a biofilm surface concentration, C Ns , ≤13.84 g of N/m 3 . At these concentrations ammonium was limiting inside the biofilm, and oxygen was fully penetrating. Conversely, for C Ns > 13.84 g of N/m 3 , oxygen became the limiting substrate inside the biofilm and ammonium was fully penetrating. Finally, a generalized procedure to estimate the effectiveness factor for a system with multiple ( n > 2) limiting substrates is given. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2014;111: 2252–2264. © 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.