z-logo
Premium
Controlling trisulfide modification in recombinant monoclonal antibody produced in fed‐batch cell culture
Author(s) -
Kshirsagar Rashmi,
McElearney Kyle,
Gilbert Alan,
Sinacore Marty,
Ryll Thomas
Publication year - 2012
Publication title -
biotechnology and bioengineering
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.136
H-Index - 189
eISSN - 1097-0290
pISSN - 0006-3592
DOI - 10.1002/bit.24511
Subject(s) - dimethyl trisulfide , cysteine , chemistry , monoclonal antibody , sulfur , sulfide , organic chemistry , dimethyl disulfide , antibody , enzyme , biology , immunology
Molecular heterogeneity was detected in a recombinant monoclonal antibody (IgG1 mAb) due to the presence of a trisulfide linkage generated by the post‐translational insertion of a sulfur atom into disulfide bonds at the heavy–heavy and heavy–light junctions. This molecular heterogeneity had no observable effect on antibody function. Nevertheless, to minimize the heterogeneity of the IgG1 mAb from run‐to‐run, an understanding of the impact of cell culture process conditions on trisulfide versus disulfide linkage formation was desirable. To investigate variables that might impact trisulfide formation, cell culture parameters were varied in bench‐scale bioreactor studies. Trisulfide analysis of the samples from these runs revealed that the trisulfide content in the bond between heavy and light chains varied considerably from <1% to 39%. Optimizing the culture duration and feeding strategy resulted in more consistent trisulfide levels. Cysteine concentration in the feed medium had a direct correlation with the trisulfide level in the product. Systematic studies revealed that cysteine in the feed and the bioreactor media was contributing hydrogen sulfide which reacted with the IgG1 mAb in the supernatant leading to the insertion of sulfur atom and formation of a trisulfide bond. Cysteine feed strategies were developed to control the trisulfide modification in the recombinant monoclonal antibody. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2012; 109: 2523–2532. © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here