Premium
A multichamber fluidic device for 3D cultures under interstitial flow with live imaging: Development, characterization, and applications
Author(s) -
Bonvin Carmen,
Overney Jan,
Shieh Adrian C.,
Dixon J. Brandon,
Swartz Melody A.
Publication year - 2010
Publication title -
biotechnology and bioengineering
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.136
H-Index - 189
eISSN - 1097-0290
pISSN - 0006-3592
DOI - 10.1002/bit.22608
Subject(s) - extracellular matrix , morphogenesis , live cell imaging , extracellular , microbiology and biotechnology , fluorescence recovery after photobleaching , biophysics , biomedical engineering , chemistry , materials science , biology , cell , biochemistry , membrane , medicine , gene
Interstitial flow is an important biophysical cue that can affect capillary morphogenesis, tumor cell migration, and fibroblast remodeling of the extracellular matrix, among others. Current models that incorporate interstitial flow and that are suitable for live imaging lack the ability to perform multiple simultaneous experiments, for example, to compare effects of growth factors, extracellular matrix composition, etc. We present a nine‐chamber radial flow device that allows simultaneous 3D fluidic experiments for relatively long‐term culture with live imaging capabilities. Flow velocity profiles were characterized by fluorescence recovery after photobleaching (FRAP) for flow uniformity and estimating the hydraulic conductivity. We demonstrate lymphatic and blood capillary morphogenesis in fibrin gels over 10 days, comparing flow with static conditions as well as the effects of an engineered variant of VEGF that binds fibrin via Factor XIII. We also demonstrate the culture of contractile fibroblasts and co‐cultures with tumor cells for modeling the tumor microenvironment. Therefore, this device is useful for studies of capillary morphogenesis, cell migration, contractile cells like fibroblasts, and multicellular cultures, all under interstitial flow. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2010;105: 982–991. © 2009 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.