z-logo
Premium
Sulfated membrane adsorbers for economic pseudo‐affinity capture of influenza virus particles
Author(s) -
Opitz Lars,
Lehmann Sylvia,
Reichl Udo,
Wolff Michael W.
Publication year - 2009
Publication title -
biotechnology and bioengineering
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.136
H-Index - 189
eISSN - 1097-0290
pISSN - 0006-3592
DOI - 10.1002/bit.22345
Subject(s) - chromatography , ultrafiltration (renal) , chemistry , virus , membrane , cell culture , influenza a virus , downstream processing , adsorption , virology , biology , biochemistry , genetics , organic chemistry
Strategies to control outbreaks of influenza, a contagious respiratory tract disease, are focused mainly on prophylactic vaccinations in conjunction with antiviral medications. Currently, several mammalian cell culture‐based influenza vaccine production processes are being established, such as the technologies introduced by Novartis Behring (Optaflu®) or Baxter International Inc. (Celvapan). Downstream processing of influenza virus vaccines from cell culture supernatant can be performed by adsorbing virions onto sulfated column chromatography beads, such as Cellufine® sulfate. This study focused on the development of a sulfated cellulose membrane (SCM) chromatography unit operation to capture cell culture‐derived influenza viruses. The advantages of the novel method were demonstrated for the Madin Darby canine kidney (MDCK) cell‐derived influenza virus A/Puerto Rico/8/34 (H1N1). Furthermore, the SCM‐adsorbers were compared directly to column‐based Cellufine® sulfate and commercially available cation‐exchange membrane adsorbers. Sulfated cellulose membrane adsorbers showed high viral product recoveries. In addition, the SCM‐capture step resulted in a higher reduction of dsDNA compared to the tested cation‐exchange membrane adsorbers. The productivity of the SCM‐based unit operation could be significantly improved by a 30‐fold increase in volumetric flow rate during adsorption compared to the bead‐based capture method. The higher flow rate even further reduced the level of contaminating dsDNA by about twofold. The reproducibility and general applicability of the developed unit operation were demonstrated for two further MDCK cell‐derived influenza virus strains: A/Wisconsin/67/2005 (H3N2) and B/Malaysia/2506/2004. Overall, SCM‐adsorbers represent a powerful and economically favorable alternative for influenza virus capture over conventional methods using Cellufine® sulfate. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2009;103: 1144–1154. © 2009 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here